Lanzamo

Interactive tax-position tool

Permanent Establishment & Tax-Residency Risk Checker

Answer a focused set of questions and get a decision-first read on whether running your company from where you actually live creates a permanent establishment or a dual-residency tax exposure. It bands your OECD-model risk LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH using the 2025 home-office 50% benchmark, the >12-month construction rule, the dependent-agent contract test, and the place-of-effective-management flag — each with a linked OECD source. This is an education-only risk band, not a determination that you have a PE or are dual-resident.

Access
Free
no account wall
Privacy
Local
inputs stay in browser
Use case
First read
not a filing service

Fields marked * are required. The rest are optional and only make the read sharper.

Your situation

Workflow

How to use it

  1. 1 Choose your incorporation country, where you physically work, and how your management decisions are made — the required inputs.
  2. 2 Answer the fixed-place, home-office, agent, construction, and treaty questions to sharpen the risk band.
  3. 3 Read the decision-first verdict: LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH PE and dual-residency risk, with the OECD concept behind each finding.
  4. 4 Save the report as a PDF, copy the summary, or take the ranked actions to a cross-border tax professional.

Why this matters

Forming a company abroad does not move your taxes abroad. If you run a US LLC (or a UK Ltd, an Estonian OÜ, anything) from where you actually live, two things can quietly create a tax bill in your home country: a permanent establishment — a fixed place, a home office used heavily for a commercial reason, a dependent agent who closes deals, or a construction project over 12 months — and dual residency, where your place of effective management sits somewhere different from where you incorporated. The OECD 2025 update rewrote the home-office rule around a 50%/12-month benchmark, and the dependent-agent test can bite with no office at all. This tool weighs your specific incorporation-country, work-location, contracting, and management facts into a LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH band, hard-rails the soft-presumption nature of the 50% rule, and caveats the US-LLC transparency mismatch — so you arrive at a cross-border tax professional with the right questions, not a costly assumption.

Frequently asked questions

Does this tool tell me whether I have a permanent establishment?

No. It bands your OECD-model risk LOW / MEDIUM / HIGH and names the concepts (fixed place, home office, dependent agent, place of effective management) so you can ask better questions. It never states that you have a PE or are dual-resident. Whether you actually do is fact-specific and depends on domestic law and your treaty — confirm with a cross-border tax professional.

Is the under-50% home-office benchmark a safe harbor?

No. The OECD 2025 update says a home used for less than 50% of working time over any 12-month period is "generally not" a place of business — a soft presumption, not a statutory safe harbor. Other factors (a commercial reason, an agent who closes contracts) can still create a PE, so do not treat "under 50%" as a guaranteed no-PE result.

Why is the dual-residency flag caveated for US LLCs?

Because a US LLC is often fiscally transparent — its income flows to its members — and US treaties commonly use a limitation-on-benefits article. So the OECD model's corporate residency tie-breaker (Art. 4(3)) does not map cleanly to a US LLC. The tool raises a flag for review when your management and incorporation countries differ, but it never concludes that your LLC is dual-resident.

What makes a construction or installation project a PE?

Under the OECD model, a building site or a construction or installation project is a permanent establishment only if it lasts more than 12 months. Twelve months or less generally does not create a PE on that ground — but connected or sequential phases can be aggregated, so crossing 12 months changes the answer.

Could my treaty change the result?

Yes. This tool models the OECD Model Convention only. Each country's domestic law and the specific bilateral treaty override it, and the 2025 Commentary is interpretive, not binding treaty text. A treaty supplies a residency tie-breaker and limits source taxation to profits attributable to a PE, so reading the actual articles with a professional is essential.

Keep going